Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrett Lewis
My first inclination was to speedy delete this. However, looking at the current guidelines, I don't see that this falls under any of the cases. IMO, a good argument for explicitly expanding the criteria for speedy deletion. older≠wiser 18:36, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity Chuck 19:12, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Unless he's done something interesting, high school seniors don't deserve encyclopedia articles. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 19:20, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity fer sure. Mdchachi|Talk 19:28, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Could be speedied as a very short article with no potential for expansion. Since it's a vanity article and he's very young, there really is no room for expansion. Geogre 19:40, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- That phrasing is not currently part of the speedy deletion criteria. The closest case I see is currently phrased Very short articles with little or no context (e.g., "He is a funny man that has created Factory and the Hacienda. And, by the way, his wife is great.") older≠wiser 19:56, Dec 14, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete on grounds of vanity. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 20:26, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Would have been candidate for {{unencyclopedic}} and "friendly deletion". --Wikimol 22:01, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, no evidence of major felonies. Wyss 23:03, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Vanity. Delete. P Ingerson 12:26, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)