Talk:Centimetre

Untitled

The table on the right side of the article incorrectly states the SI unit as 10^3, I don't know how to fix that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.156.168.253 (talk) 20:02, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Think it'd be too much to actually show a picture of how big a centimetre is?

I think that would be a good idea, I actually searched for this to quickly find something to compare with...80.202.227.170 12:34, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Practically it would be difficult, if not impossible. Different screen resolutions on different sized screens would make the image different for everyone. Maybe there's a way around that though, I'm not sure. Sven945 (talk) 19:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

who much inches is in one centimetre

50/127 that's who much

I agree that it should say how many centimeters equal one inch.

To see all kinds of rulers, including centimeter, check out the below website. You can print them out, too.

http://www.vendian.org/mncharity/dir3/paper_rulers/

Localisation inconsistency

I can't help but notice that the article is "centimetre" but the table on the right uses "centimeter" and "meter". I realise that the first line states that "er" is US, but isn't the standard for the content to conform to the localisation of the title? - Wite_Noiz

agree this is the US english version. It should be changed to centimeter. This article needs a lot of cleanup too. 152.3.84.131 20:26, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the US English version. This is the English version. I think normal procedure is to respect the creator of the article's spelling. 80.202.227.170 12:37, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The International Inch?

Comment on length of inch, briefly here, withdrawn. Evidently the inch's definition was changed by international convention from the former Imperial inch to exactly 2.54 cm while my back was turned in 1959. However, there are some references to a slightly larger inch still used by the US Coast and Geodetic Survey (in use since 1866). Perhaps the inch mentioned on the Centimetre main page should have the qualifier "International" attached to it?

--Spock2 07:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chim?

Can anybody provide a reference to chim being an abbreviation for centimetre? I've never heard of it.

The "uses of centimetre" section is a bit silly, it is used everywhere you want to measure a length, area or volume. Capacitance is measured in Farads, not cm; and virtually all maps I have ever seen use cm, not just Canada, with the possible exception of US maps. There is no corresponding "Uses of" section in the inch or Metre articles.TiffaF 10:22, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing chim --Satanorsanta 20:39, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Errors on page

FYI I believe there are errors on this page which I am unable to correct The centimeter is listed 10 x10-3 meter(engineering) and the then 1E-2 meter(scientific). The correct amount should be 10 x 10-2 meter and 1E-2 meter. From page below "centimetre can be written as 10×10 − 3 m (engineering notation) or 1 E-2 m (scientific E notation) — meaning 10 × 1 mm or 1 m / 100 respectively." If you click on the engineering link you'll seen the proper 10x10-2 m notation. Therefore the number in the upper right box is also wrong at 10x10-3 m as this is a millimeter. Perhaps someone who reads this know how to edit this items —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deww (talk • contribs) 20:23, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This page states: "The centimeter is one-billionth of the distance from the North Pole to the South Pole passing through Paris, France." This is incorrect for two reasons, the original proposed definition of a meter as 10,000,000 the distance from the equator to the North Pole through Paris would make a centimeter two-billionth of the distance from the North Pole to the South Pole. Secondly, as can be read on the meter page, that is not how the meter is now determined and the circumference through the Poles is more than 40,000 kilometers. NeilCoughlin (talk) 22:01, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

cm change in degree

38.7cm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.229.89.61 (talk) 01:43, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

picture of 1 cm

there is a png of a centimetre that claims it is precisely 1 cm (as long as the width isn't changed) this should be removed because a unit of length can't be accurately displayed on a screen. on my imac display it appears to be 9mm. the dpi, dot pitch and other factors all affect the accuracy of this image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.179.252.140 (talk) 18:18, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

how tall in feet is someone that is 180.34 cm

--216.81.178.90 (talk) 12:57, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article tells you that 1 cm is about 0.39 inches. So by the magic power of the calculator's multiply key, you will get your answer. How on Earth did you measure someone's height to a tenth of a mm while allowing for slouching, bouncy hair, squishy skin and phases of the moon (yes, it does effect you by a small amount) ? Stepho talk 13:58, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just a tad taller than someone that is 5' 10.866 141 732", apparently... 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 01:11, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While of course people can't be measured by the millimeter, it may make sense to do so by the half-centimeter, or perhaps even the quarter-centimeter.--2001:A61:2082:4701:44D9:D757:E5F9:9826 (talk) 16:30, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Traditional measurements or people in ancient units limits it to feet and inches (ie a resolution of about 2 cm). Modern measurements of people in most countries (ie typically by doctors and listed on ID forms) is to the cm. Never fractions of inches or fractions of cm. Doctors know that people's posture changes the measurement by more than 1 cm, so it's no use trying to be more accurate. Stepho talk 20:00, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]