Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poodlefaker (0th nomination)

Poodlefaker was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was TRANSWIKI to Wiktionary.

Silly dicdef/neologism. Also the other page, where is it; poodlefakery Dunc_Harris|☺ 22:43, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Delete: It's the new SNAG (sensitive new age guy), or the new Metrosexual, or the new.... Yeah, it's slang, dictdef, ephemeral. Geogre 00:42, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Ping's work is good and an heroic effort at rescue. I like the etymology. I wish I could change my vote, but I think it's still pretty much a dictionary definition. (Fascinating: a fakir for the poodles. Great stuff. I hope you also put that at Wiktionary.) Geogre 00:47, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Perhaps this is inappropriate in an encyclopaedia. But can you forward me to a better site for it? None seem worth the bother. (the originator)
- See urban dictionary, everything 2, wiktionary (but check out the lasts guidelines on slang). Dunc_Harris|☺ 19:38, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Author: take another look at the article, please. I think, with some history of the term and some broadening out into new uses, it might well be Wiktionary. Good luck, and please don't mistake our deletion of this entry as a lack of desire for your contributions. Geogre 00:47, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Delete. One of the best dicdefs I've seen in a while, but it's still a dicdef, and I can't see how to make an article out of it. Andrewa 01:56, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)
copy edit, transwiki to wiktionary, delete from wikipedia. -- Jmabel 03:52, Aug 7, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.