Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Black hole/archive1
I have never edited this article, but it seems quite broad, well written, NPOV and interesting. So much in fact, that I'm surprised it is not featured already. - Taxman 23:34, Jul 22, 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Excellent piece, it is scientifically accurate and well written. Props to the communtiy.
- Support. Fascinating read and covers the most recent discoveries. --Zerbey 17:11, 23 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Support. I'm not qualified to say if the science was right, though I'll take Zerbey's word for it, but very well-written. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 16:30, 2004 Jul 24 (UTC)
(not a vote) Can we get some pictures showing suspected locations of black holes (say, from Hubble)? Also, can someone expand the lead section? Thanks.Great. Dan Gardner 17:35, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)- Lead section expanded a bit. What do you think? - Taxman 17:29, Jul 27, 2004 (UTC)
(not a vote) Didn't Stephen Hawking say some of his theory on the black hole was wrong? Not sure how that fits in, but here it is.[1]- Support. And it has a nice picture too. Hawking did recently announce a modification of his view of black holes as mentioned in the article above. However its a fairly subtle point relating to how information may be released from a black hole and resolves the Black hole information paradox. It looks like User:Stw has already updated the black hole article. -- Solipsist 10:46, 27 Jul 2004 (UTC)