Jump to content

Talk:Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fountain

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notes

[edit]

I was just in London at this memorial, and I have several questions (I also have some photos sans water that I'll try to upload shortly):

  • Anyone know who the archtect and/or designer were?
  • I believe the stone is granite; can someone confirm?
  • What's the diameter of the oval?
  • What's the actual width of the streambed? (I guessed around 5 feet).
  • How on earth are they going to keep the area around the "fountain" from turning into a mudbath? It's been open only 2 weeks and already the grass directly next to the streambed is trampled into the ground. It's surrounded by what looks like temporary fencing-- is this to try to keep people off the grass to let it recover during off-hours?
  • How many hours a day/when does the water actually flow?
  • Is it really in Hyde Park or in Kensington Gardens? I think it's the latter, but the original sentence that I took from the Diana, Princess of Wales article said Hyde Park.

Thanks.

Elf | Talk 04:47, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)

As of today (see sig) the area isn't exactly a mudbath, although the area adjacent to the Fountain is quite muddy but fairly firm to walk on and there's a large overflow puddle at the bottom.
And it's in Hyde Park, on the east side of the Serpentine Bridge, but quite close to the border with Kensington Gardens. Lee M 01:24, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)

The cornerstone was laid in 1993? That can't be right, surely? --[[User:Bodnotbod|bodnotbod » .....TALKQuietly)]] 17:26, Aug 11, 2004 (UTC)

You're right, that was me losing track of what decade I'm in. I still date my checks 198x sometimes... Elf | Talk 18:43, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Photos

[edit]

I took some photos but when I was there, July 19, there was a work crew with two huge pumps and brooms and hoses everywhere. I was trying to get a nice photo that showed the tranquil Serpentine in the background and/or showed the oval as a whole, all without the work crews or hoses, but that proved challenging. I used this photo that's currently at the top of the article but maybe this photo showing the whole oval more or less would be better... or maybe someone can get there on a day when they're not cleaning it and the water is running and get a better photo. Elf | Talk 19:47, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)


"people will be prevented from walking or running in the water by six people employed to watch over visitors."

I didn't see any watchers when I visited the fountain today, unless of course they were disguised as members of the public. Nobody was actually wading in the water (too cold!) but lots of people were walking on the concrete perimeter, even though this is hazardously steep in places. Lee M 01:24, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)

POV Issues

[edit]

The descriptions of this seem unnecessarily twee (yes, OK, that's my opinion), but also a little lacking in NPOV. Perhaps we could take some of the artistic judgement out of it? Andrewferrier 20:07, 2004 Nov 27 (UTC)

[edit]

Some are coming to 404s... anyone care to dig up caches? microchip08 (talk) 16:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diana, Princess of Wales Memorial Fountain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]