User talk:Danko Georgiev
|
|
|
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
[edit] Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Alexander Davydov into Quantum biology. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 16:28, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the notice. I have removed the copied text and replaced it with my original wording. Danko Georgiev (talk) 19:18, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:PlanetMath editor
[edit]Template:PlanetMath editor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 04:03, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
Copyright problem on Theories of general anaesthetic action
[edit]Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://philpapers.org/rec/GEOQIT-2, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. If you are the copyright holder and wish to release this material under a compatible license, please see WP:Donating copyrighted materials for an explanation of how to do it. There's a sample permission email at WP:Consent. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 19:25, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for providing the link to donating text to Wikipedia. The mentioned article of mine was cited, but it appears that the word overlap in the mentioned text segment was too high and needed significant rewriting. Best wishes, Danko Georgiev (talk) 05:56, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Friedrich Beck.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Friedrich Beck.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:32, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Reverted edits in Uncertainty principle
[edit]Please review the policy at WP:COI. Johnjbarton (talk) 17:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Please don't edit the Talk pages directly.
[edit]On Talk:Uncertainty_principle#Dubious you added a bunch of text. That text is available in the "view history" tab for the page. There is no reason to dump it in the Talk page. By editing the page directly we can't reply. I gather you are upset, please take some time. Communications is difficult. Johnjbarton (talk) 19:25, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Hormone response element
[edit]On the redirects to hormone response element you said "loop redirect removed." What do you mean by "loop redirect"? Rusty 🐈 23:28, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- Loop redirect is Link from Hormone response element (HRE) to empty page that redirects back to "Hormone response element". I have now deleted the redirects so that now the pages are "empty". Example glucocorticoid response element - check the History, it had redirect to HRE page, which I deleted to terminate the Loop. I suppose someone with zero understanding of what is the purpose of Wiki links, saw "red link" for non-existing page, then went and created the non-existent page with redirect back to "Hormone response element". This is NOT the way to create new Wiki-pages and definitely not the way to Loop back page onto itself. If my guess is incorrect and cannot be explained by pure ignorance, then someone on purpose created Loop redirects in order to mess up Wikipedia. I hope this answers your question. If not, please ask again whatever is not clear. Danko Georgiev (talk) 09:22, 3 August 2024 (UTC)