Talk:Little Big Adventure 2

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

POV

A wee bit 'o POV and some unencyclopedic features; needs to be fixed. --207.54.102.45 17:55, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fixing the articles for both LBA1 and LBA2 because of innacuracies and poor grammer use. I've also fixed some of the other articles related to it and added a Weapons section to both articles.88.105.158.74 20:30, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"the game"

I think that the "The Game" paragraph should be greatly reduced, if not removed altogether. --daunrealist 23:11, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warez

Someone should take the link off to the game download...this isn't abandonware yet.

What WAS the link for the download? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.13.79.97 (talk) 09:55, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just use google - http://www.google.com/search?hl=sv&q=lba%202%20torrent%20download&lr= (google links are NOT forbidden, removing this comment is vandalism). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ran4 (talk • contribs) 13:33, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prequel

I realize the Chaosfish removed the Prequel link, but I think that since it is the only project in the LBA community that has shown significant progress, I believe it warrants a link at least. ;)

While it doesn't use the LBA 2 engine, it still is relevant, unless someone can come up with a good argument as to why it isn't... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Double-J (talk • contribs) 19:15, 3 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Undergas.png

Image:Undergas.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Little Big Adventure 2 esmers arrival.jpg

Image:Little Big Adventure 2 esmers arrival.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia clean-up

I cleared the trivia section by moving it into different sections of the main article. For now it is just copy pasted but it can be improved. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.104.140.25 (talk) 13:21, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone help me?

I played this game when i was a child and now i would like to play again but i don't have the cd and i tried to get in internet but all versions that i got have problems if someone know e where i can get this game i would like a lot thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.53.160.122 (talk) 23:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC) ebay :) I have my original :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.192.165.124 (talk) 20:58, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalizm

Both LBA 1 and LBA 2 articles were recently vandalized by user Eik Corell. I reverted the changes and hope it won't happen again. OutOfTimer (talk) 05:43, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

Why does the term 'Emerald Moon' redirect to this page? Shouldn't it go to Emerald Moon Records? 66.56.30.44 (talk) 23:12, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Advanced for Its Era

I feel like this is an unsupported claim especially when comparing to a game like Doom. Doom came out around the time online rasterization was still an academic topic. Also the AI claims are highly assertive but the evidence for it is superficial at best. Those sections should compare games closer to its release if they want to make the claims still sound founded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.179.170.9 (talk) 23:12, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Source