Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Category:Political parties
Appearance
The following discussion comes from Wikipedia:Categories for deletion. This is an archive of the discussion only; please do not edit this page. -Kbdank71 19:58, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
See below. Renaming makes searching easier and eliminates the pesky adjectives. If we can get a bot to do it, that would be great. Neutralitytalk 05:32, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Support. Good idea. JuntungWu 17:42, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Support. This is pretty clear-cut, much more so than the "military history" categories. – flamurai (t) 18:42, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Support. Seems eminently sensible. Ngb 23:30, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- What about the European Parliament parties / groups? What format should those cats take? zoney ♣ talk 22:57, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Category:Political parties in the European Parliament. Neutralitytalk 16:13, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Agree, but who does the work? Gangulf 10:28, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I have placed a notice on Category:Political parties by nationality stating that the renaming is in progress. With 222 categories to be done, this will take a while, even with a bot. RedWolf 16:50, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)
- Notice now on Category:Political parties by country due to renaming of above. RedWolf 04:17, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
- Support, strongly. -Willmcw 22:41, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)
The suggested changes have been implemented. -- Beland 02:21, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Proposed move in line with naming conventions. I apologize for moving the one article in the category already. I have never proposed a move for a category that I did not create myself before and was unaware of the guideline. - BanyanTree 01:56, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Move as proposed per naming conventions. Fine. Now, can we move onto categories with more than one entry? Sigh. --A D Monroe III 19:56, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- No, this should actually be renamed to Category:Political parties in Sudan to fall in line with the discussion of Fooish political parties to Political parties in Foo listed on February 17. RedWolf 04:25, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
- This has already been accomplished in the aforementioned mass move. (Just finished being implemented today.) -- Beland 02:32, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)