Talk:Max Born

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Max Born article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Max Born has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 25, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 11, 2017.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as High-importance).

Physics: Biographies High‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

Germany High‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

"Quantum Astronomy: The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle". Yahoo! News. No date. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

On 12 December 2017, Max Born was linked from Google, a high-traffic website. (Traffic)

All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

An interesting paper

While researching a certain topic I came across a very interesting 1982 paper of a talk given by Abraham Pais to the (then) Optical Society of America conference in Tucson, Arizona. Apparently, two months later it was pubished by Science.

I think it is relevant to this article, but I am not sure how useful it is to the editors of this article. Also, I have no idea where I could incorporate the citation (with PDF link). I suppose external links would be OK if there is no other place for it. Would the editors of this article be interested in a "Further reading" section, beginning with this paper? Also, the title in Science varies slightly with the title of the paper. In any case, its your decision and here is the paper:

Pais, Abraham (1982). "Max Born's Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics" (PDF). Science. 218 (4578): 1193–8. doi:10.1126/science.218.4578.1193. PMID 17802457. Address to the annual meeting of the Optical Society of America October 21, 1982 (Tucson AZ). Retrieved 2013-09-8

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Steve Quinn (talk • contribs) 00:51, September 8, 2013 (UTC)

The quotation about the "root cause of all the evil in the world"

The quotation regarding the source of evil, supposedly taken from Born's Nobel Prize lecture, does not appear in the lecture, as anyone can confirm (relatively brief and easy to read, it is readily available on line).

Nor does it appear in the informal speech he gave at the banquet held in his honour (https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1954/born/speech/). The footnote on the quotation sends the reader to his son's article, where his son says it was part of the lecture; since he includes one of the German phrases, it appears he had an original draft that may have included the quotation: if so, that source should be located.

In the meantime, the writer of this Wikipedia article might either find the source or make it clear to the reader that it's something his son, not Max Born himself, says. This is important, even though the quotation does reflect very well Born's general thought on the matter.

P.S. The German is found quoted at https://de.wikibrief.org/wiki/Max_Born, but it too lacks any reference to a source. The Chinese Website also quotes the German, but leaves a lot out (and replicates the reference in the present English version). 159.2.65.153 (talk) 21:07, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good that you have come here. You are probably referring to the edit that I reverted per wp:no original research. Yes, we could take it, provided a source could be found that directly supports the statement. Note however that —in artciles— we never say "It should be noted that..." We just say it and stick a proper wp:secondary source to it. Happy source hunting

. - DVdm (talk) 22:00, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]