Talk:Domitian II
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Domitian II be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Oxfordshire may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
[edit]This entry is misleading. With so little evidence of existence, "emperor" and "rule" should be avoided or put into a clearer context. Maximus Rex 20:13, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
I agree it is misleading to call Domitianus II an Emperor as he never controlled the city of Rome or a military force sufficiently powerful as to preserve his regime against rivals. He is more correctly categorised as a Roman usurper.Pjbjas (talk) 17:06, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (military) articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- Start-Class biography (royalty) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (royalty) articles
- Royalty work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Classical Greece and Rome articles
- Low-importance Classical Greece and Rome articles
- All WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome pages
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class biography (military) articles
- C-Class Roman and Byzantine military history articles
- Roman and Byzantine military history task force articles
- C-Class Classical warfare articles
- Classical warfare task force articles
- Wikipedia requested images of military-people
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Oxfordshire