Talk:Russian monitor Novgorod

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Russian monitor Novgorod article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Russian monitor Novgorod has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 3, 2015	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 3, 2015.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Novgorod's unusual design (top deck layout pictured) gave the warship a reputation as one of the worst ever constructed?

Russia: Technology & engineering / History / Military Mid‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

Military history: Maritime / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Comment

I have been amassing data for many years on these type of circular ironclads. This is for a definitive book following an early article in 1974 on these vessels that I had published in the INRO (International Naval Research Organization Journal) " Warship International " (Ref: No 3 1974 p 218).

Would appreciate any data people may have concerning them including rare photographs.

Dr Cliff Roffey

e-mail address; cgroffey@aol.com

Images

We really ought to have an image - surely one of the ones in the external links is out of copyright? -- ALoan (Talk) 17:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a spectacular painting in Commons currently. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 15:06, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Popovka?

A translation/explanation of "popovka" the first time it appears would be appreciated by people who don't speak Russian. (i.e *why* did Tsar Alexander nickname it "popovka" - is it a slang term for "great wallowing beast"? Is it a reference to a similarly shaped bread roll? Is it just Popov's name with a '-ka' attached? Then what does the '-ka' mean? Is it a marker for a diminutive? a superlative? an expletive? Is there any significance for the Tsar to be giving it a nickname?) With the statement as it is currently, I feel I'm missing something that would be obvious to someone with more knowledge of Russian and 19th century Russian history. -- 160.129.138.186 (talk) 16:01, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The middle paragraph of the background section wasn't clear enough to show the relationship between the nickname and the designer?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:04, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This wasn't obvious to me either. I've tweaked the sentence to indicate that the nickname is derived from the designer's surname. Modest Genius ^talk 10:32, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One source template

Hi all, I added the "this article relies heavily on one source" template because the supermajority of sources were from Mclaughlin. JuxtaposedJacob (talk) 05:05, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, McLaughlin is the only thorough discussion of the ship available in English. And I'm not about to try and translate his Russian sources just to get rid of this template.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]