Talk:Jury nullification
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jury nullification article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Comment
[edit]Camden 28. Go to www.camden28.org. US 1973 Antiwar trial. Defendants found not guilty by jury despite being caught in act of the distruction of draft files.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pbcouming (talk • contribs) 14:10, 13 July 2007
UK Section - Colston 4/Bristol 4
[edit]- https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jan/04/jury-in-colston-statue-trial-urged-to-be-on-the-right-side-of-history
- https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-59892211
- https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/colston-bristol-verdict-city-history-b1988937.html
- https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/colston-4-cleared-bristol-city-6447349
- https://thebristolactivist.com/2022/01/06/not-guilty-colston-4-acquitted-by-jury-majority/
213.249.161.145 (talk) 18:28, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- See also
- - http://insulatebritain.com/2023/05/15/breaking-high-noon-at-crown-court/
- - https://juststopoil.org/2023/07/17/breaking-dozens-more-people-risk-prison-for-literally-upholding-the-law/
- - https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/activists-jailed-for-seven-weeks-for-defying-ban-on-mentioning-climate-crisis/
- - https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/climate-activists-risk-contempt-charges-over-placards-outside-court-mkxqk5rtx Chorl (talk) 14:44, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- I've added a paragraph to the UK section for this; one might want to add one for the Bristol verdict Chorl (talk) 11:40, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
Explain what is being nullified
[edit]For a reader unfamiliar with the common law system, the term "jury nullification" may intuitively mean that either the jury or its verdict is nullified, which (as I understand it now) is not the case: the term apparently means that the jury nullifies the law for this case. It would be good if this was explained early in the intro. – gpvos (talk) 16:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC) – gpvos (talk) 16:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC)