Jump to content

Talk:Christian denomination

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Colon

[edit]

What's with the colon? Why isn't this just called "Denominations of Christianity"? [Jengog]

LDS

[edit]

The LDS movement's being discussed twice, once in the "Western" and once in the "Other" section. Surely these should be comsolidated. Alai 16:25, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Christian denomination. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:31, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Christian denomination. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undue weight / article topic

[edit]

I would expect this article to be about Christian denominations as a structure or institution, their typical programs and activities. Instead, we seem to have a listing of Christian denominations in paragraph form. I question whether this is a worthwhile article subject and form. However, I especially object to the Christian_denomination#Modern_history Modern history section, which seems like a very strange selection of obscure groups. Why these groups? There are many thousands of Christian denominations. Why single these out? Daask (talk) 05:12, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely an obscure list.
Furthermore, the definition given at the beginning of the article would fit associations formed by many non-denominational churches. A denomination is a particular kind of organization. I am personally not sure how to define it better. They often have seminaries. They may have some degree of governing authorities over the individual churches. They may own the church real estate. These things are generally not true of the looser associations. But, I could not tell the difference from this article. MissMartha8 (talk) 19:58, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ha Sueng-Moo's View of Church History

[edit]

I am unclear what the significance of the "Ha Sueng-Moo's View of Church History" chart added to the article. At a minimum, it appears refundant to the original chart. If there are issues with the original chart, I'd rather they be discussed and corrected than competing charts added. More importantly, it is not clear who is Ha Sueng-Moo? Does his view reflect a majority or a significant minority opinion? Is its inclusion here undo weight? –Zfish118talk 14:51, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the chart because I don't fully understand it, but there seem to be inconsistencies. For instance, there is an unbroken line linking the early church to the "reformed church", which does not seem to be a majority scholastic view. I'd recommend discussing the chart at WP:Wikiproject Catholicism. –Zfish118talk 21:14, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Honors World Religions

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Madelgdowski01 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: SunnyWooKim, AllisonManley.

— Assignment last updated by Gerdesk (talk) 20:11, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Branches of Christianity has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 28 § Branches of Christianity until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 19:55, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]