Talk:Concordat of 1801

Catholicism Mid‑importance

Concordat of 1801 is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bishops

Weren't bishops appointed by the French government on proposal from the Pope? (i.e. the government could refuse candidates presented by the Pope?) David.Monniaux 11:20, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Revolutionary Calendar

According to French Revolutionary Calendar, the calendar remained in use until 1806. Therefore I have deleted the statement in this article that the Concordat abolished the revolutionary calendar. If you want to change it back, please indicate your source. RussBlau 22:26, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)

Both editors who added that erroneous info misunderstood the Concordat (actually the Organic Articles). Only the Sabbath or Sunday was reestablished, not the entire Gregorian calendar. Here is the specific sentence in the Organic Articles (III.41): "No religious festival, with the exception of the Sabbath, can be established without the permission of the Government." — Joe Kress 03:40, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Spelling

Is this article in English or in American ? On the same line I read “favour” and “favor”: “...tilted firmly in Napoleon's favour. Now, he could win favor with the Catholics ...” BruKerst (talk) 16:49, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Concordat of 1801. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110206213909/http://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/resources/countries/france to http://berkleycenter.georgetown.edu/resources/countries/france

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]