United States: Music / History Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Music portal This article is supported by WikiProject American music (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as High-importance).

Regional and national music Low‑importance

	Music history of the United States in the 1980s is within the scope of the WikiProject Regional and national music, an attempt at building a resource on the music of all the peoples and places of the world. Please visit the project's listing to see the article's assessment and to help us improve the article as we push to 1.0.Regional and national musicWikipedia:WikiProject Regional and national musicTemplate:WikiProject Regional and national musicRegional and national music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History High‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I'm curious about how effeminate bands like Motley Crue and Guns N Roses, with perms, lipstick, blush, eyeliner and all that jazz can really be called "hypermasculine." Sure, it's not as bad as the glam rock "boys just want to be girls" trend, but hypermasculine it's not.

The punk rock section is also sadly under-done, and in need of some revision. I guess I could do that sometime...

Appearances aside, those bands were macho, sang loud, aggressive, nuance and subtlety-free songs with vulgarity, undisguised lust and anger. Tuf-Kat 07:57, Dec 23, 2003 (UTC)

A few issues...

I'd personally disagree with categorizing Guns 'N Roses as "hair metal", but there is a rather big error re:the Stone Roses. How would a band (from the UK, not US, but that is not an issue) whose biggest success took place in 1989 and who disbanded in the mid-90s be considered a 2000s phenomenon? Wouldn't it be more accurate to put the White Stripes, BRMC or the Yeah Yeah Yeahs as representing the US 2000s neo-garage movement rather than the Stone Roses? I do like the Stone Roses and they were quite influential (not necessarily on those aforementioned bands, and more in the UK than US) but they were long gone by the 2000s

I agree on both counts. Tuf-Kat 07:54, Dec 23, 2003 (UTC)

Suggestions

Just a few suggestions:

The grunge movement and subsequent death of said movement deserves more coverage than a couple of sentences. A form of music that changed the entirety of rock forever deserves heavy coverage.

Also, Korn is not widely accepted as a rapcore band. Nü-metal, yes. Rapcore, not so much.

There is also a large lack of mention of the "mall-goth" musical styles, with Marilyn Manson hardly being mentioned. I'm not a big Manson fan, but he is extremely popular and at least deserves mention on that part.

And as somebody else noticed, the punk rock section is missing a lot of information. Glossing over some of the most important musical contributions just doesn't seem right somehow.

2000s

This section seems just about completely wrong (as well as only covering rock). REwrite anyone? Rmhermen 00:56, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Punk rock

This section is largely a mess. Aside from early Husker Du, nothing here is punk rock. Additionally, heavy metal is discussed in the section a lot. It seems like this section should be about alternative rock and the legacy of punk but it really doesn't convey the point effectively. WesleyDodds 09:30, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Electroclash

Los Angeles Electroclash? in the 1980's? This writer seems pretty confused... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.234.153.158 (talk) 03:53, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

In my opinion, it would be best to merge all of the content in this article into this article, this article and this article, since we do not need two different articles which would cover the exact same topic in detail. What do you think? TheCuriousGnome (talk) 01:29, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Music history of the United States in the 1980s. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110512223315/http://www.jamaicans.com/news/announcements/IRAWMAdougefresh.shtml to http://www.jamaicans.com/news/announcements/IRAWMAdougefresh.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:33, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Madonna, Rotterdam, 26-8-1987.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:25, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]