Talk:The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 60 days

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Canada: Music B‑class Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian music.

perfect tense or past

In Special:diff/old/1153261822|Trovatore edit of 06:14, 5 May 2023]], "he had simply sung" is reverted to "he simply sang".

Regarding the comment

... he sang the new lyrics from then on. The ending point is his death, which is not really available as a point in time to end the past perfect

the documentary doesn't know about his death, but we do. Surely you are not suggesting that this grammar constitutes a case of WP:SYNTH!

Saying "he sang" really only tells us he sang it that way once. The perfect tense is consistent with something done over a period of time, e.g. multiple times, and past perfect means it's no longer being done, whereas the simple past tense suggests something that was only done once. Fabrickator (talk) 16:18, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mm, no, I don't agree with that. What's happening here is that English uses the same verb form for the preterite and the imperfect, expressing both with the simple past. The sense here is imperfect rather than preterite.

The past perfect can be every bit as single-event-focused as the simple past; the difference is that the single event happened before some other event in the past that the reader is supposed to understand from context. --Trovatore (talk) 16:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Musical-instrument brand names ("Personnel" section)

I went to a lot of effort to establish these - their identities are almost as crucial to the Lightfoot sound as those of the players themselves. However, someone decided to delete all but one of them, claiming to me on their chat page [sic]: "it's not S.O.P. for personnel sections, I removed the brand names and my rationale is article consistency".

In case a supervening editor sees fit to overrule this deletion, here are the brand-name credits again, in full:

Gordon Lightfoot – Gibson 12-string acoustic guitar, vocals
Terry Clements – Gretsch electric guitar
Pee Wee Charles – MSA pedal steel guitar
Rick Haynes – Kramer bass
Gene Martynec – Moog synthesizer

Birdman euston (talk) 23:56, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted this edit, no other musical article (if there is, I haven't seen it) list brand names for guitars, bass etc. Hammond organs and Moog keyboards are normally linked as proper nouns. The forms of participation (for example, instruments) should be written in lowercase (except for proper nouns such as Hammond organ or Dobro), delimited by commas, and linked on the first occurrence only. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In a quick search for 'Gretsch guitar', for example, I found three musical articles in which it was included in the "Personnel" section. Imo, any systematic attempt by Wikipedia editors to remove the make, let alone model, of musical instrument used in a recording is woefully misguided, for the reason I gave in my original complaint above. Birdman euston (talk) 14:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I forgive you

Even though I can't answer for anyone else but we make mistakes God lives all 2600:100C:B2F6:D9C:0:36:EFBB:B01 (talk) 06:03, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]