Talk:Brian Williams

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brian Williams article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 10 days

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

New Jersey

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

February 8 to 14, 2015 (17th)

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Brian Williams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:43, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OMG

What I'm missing in this article is secondary sources criticizing the tedious repetition of the phrase "our lead-off panel on a ____ night". Surely I'm not the only one who's sick of it. Drmies (talk) 03:06, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Partly done Request forwarded to H. Lawrence Culp, Jr., Chairman of GE. O3000 (talk) 11:34, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy section

WP style is to not have Controversy sections. There should not be a ghetto for all the negative or embarrassing things about the subject. This text needs to be merged into the main history. Ashmoo (talk) 15:04, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong. Themanoflaw049 (talk) 04:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources for one million dollars quote

This quote has been repeatedly added to the article, but then removed due to lack of any reliable source. Here are some reliable sources:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/03/06/msnbc-suggests-that-america-has-population-327/

https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2020/03/06/us/ap-not-real-news.html

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/mar/06/msnbc/bad-math-msnbc-bloombergs-ad-spending-wasnt-enough/

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/brian-williams-math-michael-bloomberg_n_5e627335c5b647a5bd314e05

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/486288-brian-williams-nyts-gay-roasted-over-math-flub-saddest-clip-in-tv-history

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/msnbc-bloomberg-error-brian-williams-mara-gay-a9383741.html

https://www.thedailybeast.com/brian-williams-and-ny-times-staffer-fail-spectacularly-at-math-using-bloomberg-tweet

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bloomberg-political-ads/

https://theweek.com/speedreads/900409/brian-williams-blindly-furthers-false-claim-mike-bloomberg-couldve-given-every-american-1-million

https://www.newsweek.com/brian-williams-mara-gay-nyt-bloomberg-math-wrong-1490953

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/clarissajanlim/msnbc-math-mike-bloomberg-one-million-dollars

https://www.businessinsider.com/mike-bloomberg-couldnt-give-every-american-1-million-2020-3

Also of note, to put this in context:

1) Mekita Rivas, the author of the tweet that Williams quoted and then agreed with, is a freeelance writer who has has been published by the Washington Post.

2) Mara Gay. the New York Times editorial board member who appeared on air with Williams, said of the tweet, "It's true."

3) Politifact rated it as "pants on fire."

4) Huffington Post called it a "mortifying math blunder."

5) The Hill quoted Sven Henrich as calling it "the saddest clip in TV history."

6) The Daily Beast said they "Fail Spectacularly at Math."

208.89.33.29 (talk) 16:56, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And later corrected it. Errors in journalism are extremely common. When they aren't corrected, that is a problem. For entry in an encyclopedia, there must be some long term significance. O3000 (talk) 17:05, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This was more than just a math error. This mistake was indicative of a childish worldview held by people like Bernie Sanders, Mara Gray, and Brian Williams that if someone as wealthy as Michael Bloomberg would just share a little bit of his wealth with the rest of us, everyone in America could be made rich. It forms the basis of their economic outlook which they then confidently share with the rest of us without realizing how shallow and mistaken it truly is. And it goes to the heart of the notion that our nation's media talking heads aren't particularly intelligent to begin with. But I'm not surprised that Williams and Gay can both find plenty of Wikipedia editors who will gladly minimize the stupidity of their utterance by trying to pass it off as just a harmless error that was later corrected. 104.174.245.161 (talk) 07:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]