User talk:MrWhipple

Hi. Welcome to my User talk page. Feel free to drop me a note about any of my contributions.

Joseph Smith, Jr.

HI!! Welcome to Wikipedia. I've noticed your work on the LDS pages, particularly JSmith, Jr. and have been meaning to welcome you to the LDS effort. Now I have an excuse. Although NPOV is always difficult on religion pages, the group here usually manages to come up with something that works. Sometimes it takes a little patience............ I changed your heading to something quite neutral "Works accepted as LDS Scriptures" for now. That doesn't mean the discussion about a more relevant heading should not continue. Perhaps there is something out there that would be a perfect compromise. Comments welcome. WBardwin 28 June 2005 23:53 (UTC)

Great Work

I really appreciate your work on Wiki; it is great. Your research adds a significant strength to your edits. We will miss you during your vacation on JS & Prophecy. Enjoy yourself and I look forward to your future edits. Storm Rider

Block

I have blocked you for a day for violation of the three-revert rule on Joseph Smith as a Prophet on June 29. I stopped counting at seven reverts.

In the future, I recommend that you consider this an electric fence and do not cross it. It disrupts wikipedia and solves nothing. Take differences to the talk page.

I also have blocked User:Gabrielsimon for the same thing. Cburnett June 30, 2005 20:14 (UTC)

Orange County, California

Since I've seen you add a few items to the Orange County, California article, I'd like to bring the Southern California WikiProject to your attention. Please take a look at the project's page and see if there is anything that interests you.

Also, since you are interested in LDS articles, I know that there is am LDS connection to San Pedro, California (from around the same time as the start of Bakersfield, California colony I think, but I haven't had the time to dig up any useful info yet. Would that be something you would be interested in? BlankVerse ∅ 12:51, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nauvoo Legion

Whipple, do you have any references for the following statements:

"On 26 June 1844, Smith sent message to Major-General Johnathan Dunham of the Nauvoo Legion that he should lead the militia to the jail in order to protect and accompany Smith and his associates back to Nauvoo. Dunham decided to ignore Smith's order, fearing such an action would instigate a major conflict that could erupt into civil war. Dunham informed no one of Smith's order or of his decision to disregard it."

I have not been successful in my reserach. It is not a commonly known fact and feel that it should be referenced. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. Storm Rider 16:26, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My understanding is this comes from Mike Quinn's research, but that others have claimed he's misreading his sources. The Legion had surrendered state arms previous to Joseph going to Carthage, so all they would be left with was their own rifles. It's pretty clear that the members were told to stay home in the wake of the murder, but I don't know if I would go so far as to say that Dunham disobeyed orders. He continued to serve in positions of responsibility under Brigham Young, so I can't imagine that he was seen as being responsible for not protecting the Prophet. --MrWhipple 22:25, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense to me. I tried to find out additional information on Dunham, but am doing well in my reserach. It would seem doubtful that Dunham disobeyed an order from Joseph that resulted in his death and Brigham then retain and use him in positions of authority.

I can have a pretty sensitive skin when it comes to tone and this paragraph seems more a subtle attempt disparage character of both Joseph and the Saints. Regardless, I think I will delete the language and ask for references. It does not belong with out some type of support. Thanks for your thoughts and I apprecaite your work on the Death of Joseph article. Storm Rider 22:38, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Orson Scott Card and Sheri Dew as controversial Mormons

Please see my comments either on my talk page or at Talk:Controversies regarding The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Thoughts? -Visorstuff 17:19, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Help at Early life of Joseph Smith, Jr.

Early life of Joseph Smith, Jr. will be featured on the Main Page on the 23rd. Vandalism will probably be frequent that day. Could you help in monitoring the page? The 23rd starts at 7 pm ET on Dec 22nd, since wikipedia goes by UTC. Thx in advance. Trödeltalk 02:06, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject LDS

Hello! I noticed you were on the list of members in the LDS WikiProject, and I was wondering if you were still interested in helping out there. You see, over the past few months, it appears that it has slowly drifted into inactivity. But you CAN help. Please consider doing both of the following:

Take ONE thing form the To-Do list and do it. Once you're done with it, remove it from the list, and from the<>{{Template:LDSprojectbox}}<>, so we know its done. Keep the page on your watchlist. We have a backlog going for more than half a year. Please help to work on it, and remove it.
Vote on the LDSCOTF, and work on it!
Tell your friends (esp. LDS friends, & esp. Wikipedian friends) about this WikiProject, and enocourage them to join (and be active).

Remember: your involvement in this WikiProject is just that - involvement! Please help us out.

(Note: I'm sending this out to everyone who's name was on the membership list, so I will NOT be watching this page for a response. If you want to contact me, do it on MY talk page, please.)

Thanks for all that you do -Trevdna 15:51, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:JosephHyrumEmmaSmithGravesite.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:JosephHyrumEmmaSmithGravesite.jpeg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 03:11, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, that bot removed your images from the Death of Joseph Smith, Jr article. I thought that they were great images. Can't you upload them again and put the fair use disclaimer there so that they can be used in the article? Bhludzin 16:55, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Smith, Jr.

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Joseph Smith, Jr., and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.

First Vision

I appreciate the efforts of Visorstuff to resolve the situation at First Vision. I now understand that he was hampered by his past involvement in this article and with John Foxe. No one is editing the article right now, but I believe that John Foxe's comments on the talk page demonstrate that he either cannot understand or refuses to comply with the WP:NPOV policy. I'm trying to gain a consensus on his inappropriate behavior, and I invite you, as a past contributor to this article, to add your comments to this discussion. If you think that my behavior also warrants criticism, I invite that as well. I will be posting this invitation on several other user talk pages, but with your past history on this article you might be aware of other editors who have walked away. Please feel free to let them know what is going on and invite their input at Talk:First_Vision#Time_for_action. 74s181 13:34, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Yahoo_mail_inbox.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Yahoo_mail_inbox.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 08:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A.D. placement

From the Wikipedia "Manual of Style":

Years

- - Either CE and BCE or AD and BC can be used—spaced, undotted (without periods) and upper-case. Choose either the BC-AD or the BCE-CE system, but not both in the same article. AD appears before or after a year (AD 1066, 1066 AD); the other abbreviations appear after (1066 CE, 3700 BCE, 3700 BC). The absence of such an abbreviation indicates the default, CE-AD. It is inappropriate for a Wikipedia editor to change from one style to another unless there is some substantial reason for the change; the Manual of Style favors neither system over the other.

--Editor2020 (talk) 19:59, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thanks for your support re: the issue of POV at the 1831/43 polygamy revelation pages, as well as JSJr. & polygamy page. My feeble attempts have met resistance from the editor who did all the 'work', and I've been away from the computer screen too often to carry on a back&forth. As Storm Rider will attest, my goal will be to insert official church statements on the subject, while keeping the NPOV. Best, A Sniper (talk) 22:31, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Proposal

There is a proposal at the JSJr & polygamy page to merge the two 1831 & 1843 revelation pages into it. Perhaps you'd like to add your two cents... Best, A Sniper (talk) 16:26, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a merge proposal has already started and voting is taking place at the article cited above. A few have already voted. --Storm Rider ^(talk) 16:39, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll take a look.--MrWhipple (talk) 16:45, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hyrum and Joseph Smith on the 1843 polygamy revelation at the Nauvoo city council meeting of 1844-06-08

Please see my correction on this subject here. I will edit to reflect shortly. Écrasez l'infâme (talk) 18:48, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great edits

keep up the great work.--Ninja247 (talk) 16:31, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yahoo mail inbox.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yahoo mail inbox.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:08, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshot Microsoft InfoPath

Hello, MrWhipple

The screenshot that you see in Microsoft InfoPath is indeed that of Microsoft InfoPath 2007. Just look at the icon on the top left hand corner. Perhaps you by mistake thought it is 2003 because it does not have Ribbons. Well, InfoPath 2007 does not have Ribbons. Fleet Command (talk) 11:51, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

I saw your comment at the WikiProject; just in case you're interested, a lot has changed since that article was written (IMO). Things have calmed down substantially, I think. ~Adjwilley (talk) 01:10, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yahoo mail inbox.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yahoo mail inbox.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MrWhipple. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MrWhipple. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MrWhipple. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]