Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Bark Town
If this is all that can be said about this subject, it doesn't deserve an article of its own. RickK 00:43, Sep 20, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Even if there was more to say about it, it's an article for a Poketown. These things need to be in a table in some article where folks will find it. Every time one of these things survives VfD, we license every vanity creator to say, "But, but, but the Pokemon are there!" Geogre 01:25, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete as above, this could not possibly be expanded. - [[User:Cohesion|cohesion ☎]] 01:26, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete both this and Template:Johto so as to discourage additional pokétown breakouts. Cianwood City (Cianwood Island) and Ecruteak City, linked from the template, are also suspect; they read like game guides and teach an outsider like me nothing about their subject. --Ardonik.talk()* 04:48, Sep 20, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: useless pseudoinformation. Wile E. Heresiarch 05:31, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete along with template. Agree with Ardonik. --Improv 10:38, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. An article for each pokemon? Okay, sure, fine. An article for each location in the games? Gimme a break. — Gwalla | Talk 17:22, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete both - Tεxτurε 17:28, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. It would save time and energy if a Wiki fictional universe project was set up where all this effort could go. Jallan 19:13, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Move to Wikibooks - I've created the start of a Wikibooks game guide to the Pokémon series of games, but unfortunately I haven't had any time to work on even basic structure of the Wikibook. However, I can imagine that these articles can become part of that game guide if and when it is started, hence the reason for the vote. kelvSYC 03:03, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Move > Wikibooks - His page for NBT shows that it exists (at least in his mind). However did anyone else think of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Pok%E9dex|WikiProject Pokédex]] when they saw this? I did. --TIB (talk) 03:04, Sep 24, 2004 (UTC)