User talk:Thegline
Since you wrote the first iteration (and vast majority) of the Kitano Takeshi article, I'd like to point out all the editing I did on it. You can check the talk page for a more indepth description, but I basically moved out a lot of the movie info since it was taking up most of the article. I took what you wrote about each one, added a little bit here and there, edited them and then made them their own articles (which still need fleshing out). I then edited the main article so the film info only had info that was related to Kitano's film career, and took out a lot of the 'extraneous' film info (who it starts, Jap. title, etc.) I invite you to go back and see if there's anything blatantly missing, or anything you'd like to add (keeping in mind that each movie has it's own article page now).
I see that you haven't contrib'd anything in a while, but if you log in sometime I'd like for you to give it a look over. Thanks for a great article to work on. --AsianAstronaut 06:37, 2004 Jun 24 (UTC)
In the Realm of the Senses
[edit]Please have a look at the questions on the talk page for the article you created, "In the Realm of the Senses". Two things that you wrote are unclear. Thank you. — O'Dea (talk) 13:35, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Blacklisting
[edit]
The article Blacklisting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Multiple issues - Please see maintenance tags. I'm not endorsing or disputing the maintenance tags, but here is a quick summary: Poorly referenced, needs cleanup in just about every way possible, disputed accuracy/legitimacy of content, possibly written like a manual, lead is too long, possible original research. Overall, IMO, the article offers little value to Wikipedia.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hannibal Smith ❯❯❯ 19:19, 4 January 2017 (UTC)