Talk:Design Patterns

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Design Patterns article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 120 days

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

Year of publication?

At the bottom it says books from 1994, but is this correct? I would expect a line like: The book was first published in 19xx, with a much improved second edition in 19xx ...

No, this is the correct version. We're still using it as a Textbook. The book basically is the bible of Design Patterns. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.204.70.20 (talk) 16:38, 8 January 2007‎ (UTC)[reply]

"Criticism has been directed at the concept of software design patterns generally, and at Design Patterns specifically."

I've noticed that "Design Patterns" is a proper name but it doesn't make sense to me that it seems to be a subset of "software design patterns". If an architect uses design patterns to build a bridge it surely doesn't depend on software design patterns. --85.199.68.80 (talk) 10:54, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd personally like the Criticisms section to be expanded. There are swathes of the software industry that have rejected this tome and its conclusions as "borderline nonsensical". Also there were some good analyses years ago, though of course I can't find them now, about how the only way this book makes any sense in a wide sense is if you are familiar with programming in SmallTalk, and how generalised languages, with OO features or not, do NOT magically conform to these forms. 2406:2D40:41A3:9910:0:0:0:51F (talk) 00:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion of Christopher Alexander and origin of the idea in the intro?

It seems really negligent to me that this page doesn't include an mention of Alexander (1977) who originated the idea with a link to pattern language.

I don't want to jump in and add it on my first visit to the page, but this page makes it seem as though the idea was originated by computer people when it comes from design. This seems an important link for an encyclopedia to make.

I propose a sentence in the intro saying: The idea of design patterns have their origin in the use of design patterns in architecture: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pattern_language#What_is_a_pattern?

Alexander, C. (1977). A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. Oxford university press.

Aldorath (talk) 05:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have you got any references to support this? Gorpik (talk) 12:16, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]