Talk:Lifted or The Story Is in the Soil, Keep Your Ear to the Ground
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Method Acting
[edit]Can someone enlighten me as to how Method Acting deals with post 9/11 issues?
TheGhostChild 21:06, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Some lines ("It's a shocking bit of footage viewed from a shitty TV screen") have been interpreted as representing the attack itself, while others have been interpreted as reflecting the hopelessness and despair that came with the attacks ("We need some reception, a higher message, just tell us what to fear"). Still others seem to reflect Oberst's final acceptance of the situation ("To shed this skin, be born again, it starts with an ending"). Oberst seems to realize that the best course of action is to simply learn to love more openly and deeply ("We have a problem with no solution but to love and to be loved"), and just learn to live with this tragedy ("And the story goes, it goes on and on..."). However, this is simply one interpretation, and while interesting, the 9/11 point probably doesn't merit inclusion in the article until it is backed up by a source or two.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.195.82.195 (talk • contribs) 06:29, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Lifted brighteyes.jpg
[edit]Image:Lifted brighteyes.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
I often think it's about Christianity. Have a think about it.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
I often think it's about Christianity. Have a think about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.169.82.44 (talk) 15:19, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Hidden Track or Covered-Up Lie?
[edit]Could someone please back up the hidden track blurb at the end of the tracklist? It's pretty foolish to put something like that there. I might as well put a few notes about the European release containing Satanic messages or something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.40.230 (talk) 06:13, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Not Emotive hardcore.
[edit]Contrary to everybody's belief that emo is "emotional" music. it's not. nothing you think is emo, is actually emo. unless you actually know what you're talking about that is. and if you do know what your talking about, help set things right. if you come a cross some section of the internets that people are arguing about what emo is, back your brothers up. although Mr. Oberst is definitely very emotional at times, while simultaneously being one of the smartest people alive, his closest musical contribution to "emo" would actually be Desaparecidos. not any of his work in bright eyes. I wanted to kill myself while reading the first post under the discussion on the bright eyes main page about not being emo. lets clean this up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.164.116.97 (talk) 03:44, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Amen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.137.1.0 (talk) 19:01, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Dead external links to Allmusic website – December 2010
[edit]Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:
--CactusBot (talk) 13:26, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Margaret Fish
[edit]In the Personnel section, there's a link to British supercentenarian Margaret Fish. I think it was probably a different Margaret Fish who played bassoon on this album. --Alexbook (talk) 16:50, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lifted or The Story is in the Soil, Keep Your Ear to the Ground. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100210115741/http://www.blender.com/guide/68964/100-greatest-indie-rock-albums-ever-151-60-to-51.html to http://www.blender.com/guide/68964/100-greatest-indie-rock-albums-ever-151-60-to-51.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:45, 15 May 2017 (UTC)