Talk:Corporate farming
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Corporate farming article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 1095 days |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sources and Bias
[edit]Although the article is well sourced throughout, in the Debate headline when talking about continents and their debates on family farming, all the other continents beside North America don't have sources to show where the author of the article got his ideas and facts. The article might seem to steer off topic at times, but it doesn't since the author talks about corporate farming in one way or another. However, there is a small bias toward corporate farming when being compared to family farms for example. The bias isn't addressed either since they talk about more benefits for corporate farming instead of balancing the pros and cons between that and other farming practices.Jgarc800 (talk) 23:16, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Technology
- B-Class vital articles in Technology
- B-Class Agriculture articles
- High-importance Agriculture articles
- WikiProject Agriculture articles
- B-Class Food and drink articles
- Mid-importance Food and drink articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles