Jump to content

Talk:Nevermind

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleNevermind has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Featured topic starNevermind is part of the Nirvana studio albums series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 26, 2009Good article nomineeListed
December 15, 2010Featured topic candidatePromoted
October 20, 2021Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Good article

Post punk

[edit]

Is it possible to take out post punk because the album has no post punk nor any post punk sounding songs because even if you listen to each song individually or even you know look at the individual pages for the songs they have post punk labeled under them I say that it was only a mislabeling of the genre for post punk as fans of nirvana would not call it post punk, post punk has a different sound than nevermind and there are people who disagree with this label as it makes no sense to call it post punk in fact it’s more reasonable to put punk rock because the instruments are more harder than post punk Thecure8985 (talk) 19:44, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it got reverted, so I may as well elaborate. No way at all. If it's properly cited by a reliable source, you shouldn't do anything about it. Even then, you can make a connection of Nevermind to post-punk through a return to certain punk aesthetics combined with influences in college and indie rock along with the grunge scene Nirvana is rooted in. R.E.M. and the Pixies were mentioned as Cobain's primary influences at least twice while writing and composing this album. So, under Christgau's opinion, that of a greatly prestigious music critic who was reviewing for 22+ years by 1991, Nevermind is post-punk in an overall spirit.
By the way, your edit was not impersonal. At the very least you could've removed the equally well-cited hard rock label on the infobox as well (since the genre is most well-known for '70s rock and even '80s metal) and I honestly wouldn't bother. But you messed with the standard. Thanks for reading this and please, don't do this or something similar again. Carlinal (talk) 18:28, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anniversary tracks

[edit]

If the page is gonna feature the chart positions for every anniversary and reissue version of the album then the page should also feature the tracklistings for the new versions. They contain new and different versions of songs and demos not on the album. 13thpunxfromthesun (talk) 18:04, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:ALTTRACKLIST, we generally only include alternative tracks when they are discussed in detail in the article itself. Generally speaking that stuff is better left to Discogs. Popcornfud (talk) 18:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]