Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fusker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was - kept

Fusker

Non-notable website. Rick K 06:51, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)

Abstaining for now, but I'm sensing there is a heaping pile of notability regarding this mother. If the outcome is to keep, this article needs to be cleaned up. Google is turning up ~84,300 hits and this software appears to be a "problem" of sorts for various image sites. If you know what I mean. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 07:33, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep. It's notable. Deserves an article but needs cleanup and expansion. --Randy 12:31, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
I don't get it. I read the article, visited the site and still have no idea what it's all about. Googling shows notability, so keep and make the article less confusing. Grue 17:40, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete as is. If it gets cleaned up, I may change my vote. DCEdwards1966 17:53, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)
- If a cleaned up version of the article would be worth keeping, the current version should be worth keeping as well. A lack of cleanup is not a good reason to delete. Factitious 08:25, Dec 2, 2004 (UTC)
Keep! VfD is not Cleanup. [[User:GRider|GRider\^talk]] 20:12, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Cleanup, but certainly keep. --Idont Havaname 23:51, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep without any question whatsoever. Sounds intriguing. Dr Zen 06:51, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep but will someone please clean up this almost incomprehensible article. -- Jmabel | Talk 01:57, Dec 1, 2004 (UTC)
Keep - there's no question about it, fuskering exists and is notable. -- Rpm 09:19, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Keep. It's notable. Also, RickK's claim above that it's a website is incorrect. Please try to find out what you're talking about before listing things on VfD. Factitious 08:25, Dec 2, 2004 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.