Talk:Bobby Hatfield

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Mid-importance).

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Hatfield's deterioration.

I can't put this into the article because it is an undocumented personal impression. Nevertheless, I saw the Righteous Brothers on TV on a golden oldie review in the late 1990's and thought that Bill Medley was still in fine voice. Bobby Hatfield, however, was not in such good shape. His eyes had the paranoid, antsy look of a chronic cocaine user and his voice was no longer the glorious instrument of the past, but a somewhat nervous and forced sounding imitation of himself. I felt very bad for Bobby and for Bill. A few years later Bobby was dead. 67.85.165.191 (talk) 11:00, 6 May 2011 (UTC)Kolef8867.85.165.191 (talk) 11:00, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Under personal life, out of the blue, there is mention of his second wife, "Linda". No last name; no other mention. Is this like, say, Cher? Is the reader supposed to know who Linda is? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.203.214.14 (talk) 07:16, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bobby Hatfield's second wife's name was Linda Torrison. Married in 1979. Barblawson (talk) 23:30, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bobby Hatfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151203220250/http://www.righteousbrothers.com/remembrance.htm to http://www.righteousbrothers.com/remembrance.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:48, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]