Talk:MacLife

Magazines Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Apple Inc. Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

"Clarified: The editors did not use the Windows operating system to smash the PCs."

:) -- well caught!

This is the sort of thing that Richard Lederer likes to write about in his "Crazy English" commentaries.

Atlant 18:23, 25 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per unopposed request. -GTBacchus^(talk) 00:24, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MacAddict → MacLife — Mac|Life issue 1 has reached at least some subscribers (including me), and the www.macaddict.com site now redirects to www.maclife.com, but do we want to keep separate articles for each? Hawaiian717 00:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add # '''Support''' or # '''Oppose''' on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.

Survey - Support votes

Survey - Oppose votes

Discussion

Add any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Why rebrand?

What's the motivation behind the name change? --24.249.108.133 05:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

macaddict was a relic from the evangelistic 90s. now that apple is mainstream again, maclife is a better fit —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.110.223 (talk) 18:12, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Typo in Date of Last MacAddict Issue

The article says the last issue of MacAddict, before it changed to Mac|Life, was “January 2006.” Should that read, instead, “January 2007?” I would make the change myself, but I have no personal knowledge in this matter, and my Google search for this specific information yielded only this article. Wackatoo (talk) 07:36, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MacAddict ran 112 issues (from 1996.09-2005.12 inclusive), AFAIR – at least those are the copies I have digitised. Someone else may have to confirm if there was a year off between 2006.01-2007.01, with issue 1 starting 2007.02 (with a peel-off sticker on cover to reveal "...Life"!) to present. Jimthing (talk) 07:56, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source

https://web.archive.org/web/19970419214947/http://www.next-generation.com:80/news/022296c.html