Talk:Canadian Alliance

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Canadian Alliance article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: Politics High‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Politics: Political parties

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as High-importance).

Conservatism Mid‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

Alright, there's clearly an edit war going on here. SimonP, 149, why don't you take it here to Talk: instead of just reverting over and over again? Bryan ummmmmmm what is the political symbol for the canadian alliance??how about you guys answer that

In response to the assertion the Reform votes did not come from the NDP, there is actually a fair bit of evidence that this did occur and that many of Reforms, and the CA supporters outside of Alberta were former NDP supporters. In general these are voters who dislike both major parties and vote for the strongest third party challenger. Look at the long NDP hled ridings in Manitoba and Saskatechewan that went for Reform in 1993. For other evidence see: [1] [2] - SimonP 19:01, Oct 19, 2003 (UTC)

Green and Blue VS Blue and Green, since the party accepts Green as official since Blue was used by the PC's in responce to the Reform/NDP... those ridings voted for Populists, and the CA became Populist, hence, the CA DID pick up some NDP supporters, but, most of those supporters were themselvs former SC supporters. Pellaken 14:35, 15 Jan 2004 (UTC)

The Conservative Party is socially progressive? Does anyone but the anonymous editor agree with this? I bet the gay and lesbian couples who would have the legal recognition of their marriages taken away if Stephen Harper and 95% of the CPC caucus had their way would disagree. I don't want to get into an edit war with someone who isn't willing to put his/her name to his/her edits, so help me out here, please. Kevintoronto 13:05, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Reform movement link

This is a useless link. The anonymous editor who keeps putting this in should read what that article has to say before linking to it. Here is the main part of that article:

Reform movement is a kind of social movement that aims to make a change in certain aspects of the society rather than fundamental changes. It is opposed to radical social movement such as revolutionary movement or reactionary movement.

What does this have to say about the Reform Party of Canada or the Canadian Alliance? Really not very much. The rest of the article provides links to various reform movements in the US, especially those in the arts. Thanks, SimonP, for keeping on top of this.Kevintoronto 17:49, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Please see Talk:Reform Party of Canada for my proposed compromise to resolve this. Thanks. Kevintoronto 19:10, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Name

Wikipedia naming conventions are to use the most common name, and Canadian Alliance is by far the most common. - SimonP 07:12, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)

What is the differ between center-right and right-of-center? Michaelm 4 July 2005 21:36 (UTC)

Centre-right implies a party that is centrist, but in the right half of the central portion of the political spectrum. Right of centre is a synonym for right wing, and refer to a party that is not centrist. - SimonP July 4, 2005 22:55 (UTC)

Unfortunate acronym early on, CCRAP. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-party-changes-embarrassing-acronym-1.240933 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.55.29.76 (talk) 15:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Canadian Tory"

The Canadian Alliance does not belong in that box. It was never called the "Tories", and actually refuted the name "tory".Habsfannova 23:14, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Reform Party of Canada into this article

The Reform Party of Canada is the same party as the Canadian Alliance. Reform was renamed the Canadian Alliance in 2000 and had minor changes to its official positions and the Canadian Alliance was dominated by former Reform MPs. There are too little differences for there to be a Reform Party of Canada article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.95.161.40 (talk) 19:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Do not merge -- each article is of suitable length. Merging would create an article that is too long. The relationship between the two parties is adequately discussed in each article, so nothing would be gained by merging. Ground Zero | t 19:40, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do not merge -- Agree with Ground Zero, and in any event these were not technically the same party. CJCurrie 04:27, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do not merge -- the relationship between the parties is adequately discussed. The difference may be small, but was there. And it did even exist in the minds of voters. --Saforrest 01:18, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Reform.jpg

Image:Reform.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Canadian Alliance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110730033124/http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/conservativeparty/ to http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/conservativeparty/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:02, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Party's ideology

Per WP:BRD, the lead remains in status quo form, until/if a consensus can be reached for a change. Attempts to 'edit-war' in changes, is disruptive. GoodDay (talk) 03:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Canadian Alliance was the new name of the Reform Party

In terms of its registration with Elections Canada, the Canadian Reform Conservative Alliance was not a new party, but rather the new name of the Reform Party of Canada, effective on 2000-MAR-27. Preston Manning was leader of the Canadian Alliance in April 2000, according to the website of Elections Canada. Here are relevant links from the Internet Archive Wayback Machine:

Press Release, Elections Canada, 2000-MAR-27 (French version)
Press Release, Elections Canada, 2000-APR-02 (French version)
Decision on Reform Party Application, Chief Electoral Officer, 2000-APR-02 (French version)
Jill Mahoney (2000-04-03). "Tories vow court action over new party's title". The Globe and Mail. p. A4. Chief Electoral Officer Jean-Pierre Kingsley decided in favour of a request by former Reform leader Preston Manning to change the Reform Party's name to Canadian Reform Conservative Alliance.
"The 2000 fight over the use of the word 'conservative'". CBC Archives. 2020-03-31. Archived from the original on 2020-04-07.
Registered Political Parties, Elections Canada, 2000-FEB-29 (note Reform Party of Canada registration date is 1988-10-21)
Registered Political Parties, Elections Canada, 2000-JUN-19 (note Canadian Reform Conservative Alliance registration date is listed with "Party Leader: Mr. E. Preston Manning" and registration date 1988-10-21)

Motivated by discussion at Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#Preston Manning as leader of the Reform Party - succeeded by "position abolished" or by "Deborah Grey as leader of the Canadian Alliance". Mathew5000 (talk) 02:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Still valid live link at https://elections.ca/content.aspx?section=med&document=decision&dir=pre&lang=e ..Moxy-

14:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose any proposed merger in the future solely because the size of the article would be massive, and it is easier to navigate the different periods in the party with the current arrangement of two articles. CentreLeftRight ✉ 21:46, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]