Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filecloud

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:40, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Filecloud

"Filecloud is a newly created file site, with free membership and a wealth of applications" and isn't encyclopedic. -- Longhair | Talk 06:47, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

• Delete -- Longhair | Talk 06:47, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. utcursch | talk 06:50, May 20, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Looks like advertising. Sjakkalle 07:03, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Seems to be self-promotion. — flamingspinach | (talk) 07:11, 2005 May 20 (UTC)
• ?NPOV? --Simon Cursitor 07:28, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
• Heavily advertised at SA, but I see no reason why it should be advertised here. Delete. Radiant_* 08:10, May 20, 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. This is very unusual...most spammers I see on here are small, non-notable firms looking for some cheap advertising. FileCloud is by no means small. Could be a fan write-up. I'm going to abstain on this one. Jamyskis 11:27, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. It is a fan write up. It really is a very good service, and I was really impressed with it. And the guys are really nice people - they don't have those auto response emails you get with some companies.. Olix 17:12, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment on previous comment: User:Olix has no edits other than to this page.
    • Comment]incorrect - I have edited/written a small handful of articles before, but I registered to comment in this section. Olix 15:17, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.