Talk:Wuchang Uprising

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 10, 2004, October 10, 2005, October 10, 2006, October 10, 2012, October 10, 2014, October 10, 2017, October 10, 2018, October 10, 2020, and October 10, 2023.

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Chinese

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

Untitled

Is there any significant fighting to warrant setting up a battlebox? I am curious to the number of initial rebels. Elle _{vécut heureuse} ^{à jamais} (Be eudaimonic!) 17:58, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could include the flag... AnonMoos 02:14, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Better info

I edited the article to make it sound more encyclopedic and adhere to the rules of the English language, but I must call into the question much of the information given, especially on the background causes of the uprising. Why is the Han Chinese's antagonism towards the ruling Manchu dynasty and foreigners not mentioned? Or the corruption and decadence of Qing China? I also find it quite suspicious that the magazine Science and Football is cited; it does not seem to be a very good authority on Chinese history. I'll try to find some better sources, but until then, this article reeks of inaccuracy. --ZhangYuu (talk) 02:51, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Banner

Better info