User talk:Taion

Welcome, comrade! I hope that you will enjoy working on this noble cause to hasten the coming of the revolution. Wikipedia:How does one edit a page, Wikipedia:Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Naming conventions should be studied thoughtfully by the true comrade. If you are ever in need, feel free to ask questions at Wikipedia:Help or the Village pump. ¡Viva la revolución! --Xiaopo's Talk 08:57, Feb 17, 2004 (UTC)

Please remember that it's not what you put in your mouth that defiles you, but it's what comes out of your mouth that defiles you. -SV(talk) 07:44, 15 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Nice edit on Libsoc

Nice edit! Thanks. --Improv 15:07, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Great Irish Famine

Hello User:Taion thanks you on your recent edit to the Great Irish Famine article. I myself will not be editing it myself for awhile, but thing it a very intresting subject. Just one thing though, could you possibly reference your contrabutions, it will save you a whole lot of hassel trust me. The over population thing? Look take care and enjoy the article, Regards --Domer48 22:44, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I reverted your recent edits as the article as had problem editors. Sorry about that, first chance I get I will address them for you, or if you wish to do it yourself. Sorry again --Domer48 21:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Starcraft

No problem. I suppose you're right about pro-gamers being more than just fans (so of course I withdraw my objection to those sources), but it's more the language barrier that's the problem, as far as I can see. Other-language sources are allowed (see WP:RSUE) if there are no English alternatives, but in cases such as Protoss (especially considering it has already been up for AfD) it will be necessary to convince other editors who don't speak the language that the sources contain sufficient coverage, and of course that it comes from a reliable source. Cheers, Miremare 22:20, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slate Star Codex AfD

Because the general notability guideline doesn't precisely define "significant coverage", I would appreciate it if you could answer the following two questions about your Delete comment in the Slate Star Codex AfD, to help me in future.

1. Could you describe what was it about the reliable sources that we cited in the article that made their coverage of Slate Star Codex not significant, in your view?

2. Can you give me an idea of what changes (e.g. more reliable sources, more in-depth coverage in a reliable source) would have changed your mind on this AfD - and what is the minimum you would require to change your mind?

For reference, the article has been automatically preserved by Deletionpedia here.--greenrd (talk) 08:12, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]