This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
I think it would be appropriate to mention the mask video and its fallout in the lead. I recognize that this is detailed further within the article, but think its omission from the lead is incorrect. I think the incident has easily satisfied notability criteria. Given the time elapsed since the photo, I also think WP:RECENT is passed as well, considering effects from this are still being felt to this day.
Having read MOS:LEADBIO, I am considering simply being bold and just putting a brief section in the lead, but thought I would first leave my intentions and explanation here for a short while.
How about this:
In May 2017, Griffin posted a video online of her holding a mask styled to look like the severed head of U.S. PresidentDonald Trump. As a result CNN fired her from its New Year's Eve broadcast with Anderson Cooper and her remaining 2017 tour dates were canceled by their respective venues. Griffin took down the video, and apologized publicly for uploading it. Subsequently, she was placed under a federal investigation by the Justice Department and on the No Fly List for two months.
I think this has been written in a neutral point of view (or at least as neutral as possible for an incident as controversial as this), but am totally open to suggestions for improvement.
Due to all of the above reasoning, I feel this addition to the lead is worthy. Greg (talk) 00:41, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Gleeanon409, that seems fair. My reasoning for the some of length is as follows: I think the first sentence needs to be sufficiently nuanced to avoid confusion/incitement. Just writing "...holding the severed head..." in my opinion would be too brief. Perhaps you view this as overly accommodating?
I think mentioning that Griffin apologized and removed the photo is also necessary, but can shorten that a bit. As for the backlash, here I am a little unsure. I think we ought to mention that there was backlash, and quite strong. If I remove the CNN New year eve and tour date parts, but leave the Justice department and No Fly List part, do you think that would suffice? I think those two are notable enough to be in the Lead. So with these changes, it would now be:
I don't feel strongly about this issue, but I lean towards leaving specific mention of the incident out. I mean, hasn't she made multiple statements that have put her in hot water? I remember around the January 2019 Lincoln Memorial confrontation, she called for the 'doxing' of the students. So instead of mentioning every off-color thing she has said (she is kind of known for that) I would moreso just make note of her political activity and note that some of her actions have led to controversy. Really, I don't think she's 'known' for the mask incident, and especially in this day and age, 'celebrities' often make comments about the current president which might shock, so I do not think Kathy's mask was especially noteworthy. That's just me. ‡ Єl Cid of Valenciatalk12:03, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That’s a good point. Maybe
Griffin is known for some controversies including holding a mask stylized as Trump’s severed head in 2017 documented in A Hell of a Story (2019).
Hello again Gleeanon409 and hi El cid, el campeador! I've left this for about a month and no other editors have contributed, so I thought it's probably time to add something. Clearly both of you thought my initial suggestion was too long. So I've added the following (pretty much what Gleeanon proposed):
Griffin is also known for some controversies including holding a mask stylized as Donald Trump’s severed head in 2017, this was documented in A Hell of a Story (2019).
While the article strongly indicates that Kenny Griffin has died, why doesn't it say so explicitly, one way or the other, like it did for Joyce Griffin dying in 2017 and Gary Griffin dying in 2014 ?98.149.97.245 (talk) 14:24, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I added a line in the Personal life section. I’m not seeing the year or cause of death readily but maybe someone else can find it. He was estranged from the family and possibly homeless as well. Gleeanon409 (talk) 20:56, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]