Wikipedia:Requests for bureaucratship/Bcorr
I'd like to apply for bureaucratship. As someone said here once before, I don't generally like to nominate myself for things, but as I've been spending more and more time on administrative and mediation duties — and less time on actual editing — I've decided that I ought to focus more on the administrative side of Wikipedia, and more consciously work on limiting my editing to a few areas of special interest and knowledge as much as possible. For those who don't know me, I've been a sysop since December 2003 and a member of the Mediation Committee since March 2004.
Thanks, BCorr|Брайен 21:19, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Support
- Strong support.Neutrality 21:20, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- —No-One Jones 21:26, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Sure. I know no reason not to support this nomination. Isomorphic 21:31, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Acegikmo1 21:38, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Michael Snow 21:38, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- VV 21:40, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- uc 22:01, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- older≠wiser 22:06, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Cecropia | Talk 22:12, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC) Definitely. And with his spare time from doing the arduous bureaucrat tasks, he can join me watching the grass grow and the snail races. :)
- Finlay McWalter | Talk 22:23, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- SUPERTY-DUPER STRONG SUPPORT! blankfaze | (беседа!) 22:30, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Dysprosia 22:31, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Of course. David Gerard 22:34, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 22:56, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- I don't know you that well, but if you're a sysop and haven't done any major havoc, then I see no reason to not let you be a bureaucrat. — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 23:20, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- pir 23:40, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Chris 73 | Talk 00:16, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Guanaco 00:22, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Serious contributor, calm community voice. Yes, Brian, you'd make a great bureaucrat. JFW | T@lk 00:34, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Strongly support. Very commited user with impressive record. Arminius 03:08, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Support, with enthusiasm. Fuzheado | Talk 03:40, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Cribcage 04:05, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- JCarriker 05:12, Aug 17, 2004 (UTC)
- GeneralPatton 15:29, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Tεxτurε 18:21, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Hell yes. - UtherSRG 18:25, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- From everything I've seen, he really does live up to his user page -- and that says a lot. Definite support. SWAdair | Talk 03:59, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- He was always adequate to the situations I've seen. Dr Bug (Volodymyr V. Medeiko) 09:50, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Catbar (Brian Rock) 10:18, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Merovingian✍Talk 15:26, Aug 18, 2004 (UTC)
- David Cannon 21:48, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC) Support, of course!
- Andries 21:52, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC) (>2500 edits since Jan 2004) Support
- Don't think you'd mess anything up if you had it :) - Fennec (はさばくのきつね) 11:51, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Warofdreams 17:46, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- [[User:Avala|Avala|★]] 22:04, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose, *insert stupid reason here*. Wait... I already tried this tactic. Darnit... I suppose I will "grudgingly" support (yeah right, Go Bcorr!). ugen64 00:41, Aug 21, 2004 (UTC)
- Andre 14:10, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Danny 15:56, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Comarde Nick @)--^-- 19:59, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Elf-friend 15:30, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Hm, I'm a bit surprised - according to the List of Wikipedians by number of edits, there are just 1472 edits by BCorr. Is it a right number? Dr Bug (Volodymyr V. Medeiko) 21:39, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- According to the list, Brian has 3711 edits in all namespaces of which 1472 are in the main (or 'article') namespace. A count from today shows edits 3778 total edits. Natryn 21:51, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
If he was here vefore the crash he should have more. I know I lost half of my edits because the stupid server crash won't count my first 600 contribs (even if they show up in my user contributions page).YAY! They fixed it! :D [[User:Ilyanep|Ilyanep Old sig...back wen I used templates...now gone]] 15:52, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)